<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Telegraphic &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com</link>
	<description>Online home of Danny Price, University of Oxford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:37:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hyperconnectivity and society</title>
		<link>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/hyperconnectivity-and-society/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/hyperconnectivity-and-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hyperconnectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve only recently become aware of the concept of Hyperconnectivity: where everything that can be networked together, is. We are already seeing changes in the way we communicate: a lot of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; apps are essentially hyperconnecting us (as human nodes) to each other. I am intrigued by the question:...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-97 thumb" title="Terminator's SkyNET is probably the worst possible outcome for hyperconnecting things" src="http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/terminator3-09.jpg" alt="SkyNET from Terminator is probably the worst case scenario for hyperconnectivity" width="120" height="120" />I&#8217;ve only recently become aware of the concept of <a title="Hyperconnectivity: a wiki definition" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperconnectivity">Hyperconnectivity</a>: where everything that can be networked together, is. We are already seeing changes in the way we communicate: a lot of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; apps are essentially hyperconnecting us (as human nodes) to each other. I am intrigued by the question: &#8220;How will we adapt?&#8221; Here&#8217;s a few links to some people&#8217;s thoughts on possible repurcussions:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Hyperconnectivity impacts" href="http://blogs.northernlight.com/blog/2008/06/19/hyperconnectivity-impact/">Hyperconnectivity Impact</a> &#8211; David Martel. A quick look at why hyperconnectivity is inevitable.</li>
<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/the-future-of-journalism-smartbrain/">Journalism in a Hyperconnected World</a> &#8211; Stilgherrian. &#8220;Hyperconnected&#8221; social networking sites send news faster than news sites &#8211; how will journalism adapt? A good read.</li>
<li><a title="Scary stuff - privacy and uberveillance" href="http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2007/11/21/privacy-surveillance-technology-oped-cx_res_1126privacy.html">Scary Stuff </a>- Robert Ellis Smith. An eloquent and truly scary look at how privacy may fall by the wayside in a hyperconnected world.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll be posting more on this sort of thing in the future. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/hyperconnectivity-and-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Hyperconnected Night Out</title>
		<link>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/a-hyperconnected-night-out/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/a-hyperconnected-night-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hyperconnectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something that&#8217;s causing a storm-in-a-teacup at the moment in my hometown is Nightkey &#8211; a new ID system that uses your fingerprint to create a biometric link between you and the ID you supply. It&#8217;s being sold as an &#8220;anti-antisocial behaviour&#8221; solution. I was outraged when I found out about...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-89 thumb" title="fingerprint" src="http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/fingerprint.png" alt="fingerprint" width="120" height="123" />Something that&#8217;s causing a storm-in-a-teacup at the moment in my hometown is <a title="Nightkey: your key to no privacy" href="http://www.nightkey.com.au">Nightkey</a> &#8211; a new ID system that uses your fingerprint to create a biometric link between you and the ID you supply. It&#8217;s being sold as an &#8220;anti-antisocial behaviour&#8221; solution. I was outraged when <a title="A facebook group about Nightkey" href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=48667365991">I found out about it</a>: I object because I feel that it&#8217;s treating your clientele like prisoners, and I believe this goes against the &#8220;innocent until proven guilty&#8221; philosophy our societal and legal paradigms are built up upon. Will it curb anti-social behaviour? Possibly. Is it treading the line between having privacy and living in a police-state? Most definitely.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to discuss the huge body of privacy concerns in this post. What I would like to discuss is the possible extension of this machine into a marketing device, and the impacts that this would have upon going out, night-clubbing and society.</p>
<h3>Welcome to the machine</h3>
<p>Consider, if you will, the manager of a savvy club with Nightkey installed on the front doors. At the end of the night, she has a look at how many people came through the door: &#8220;Hmm. only 278 tonight, we&#8217;ll have to get some better bands next Saturday. And out of those 278, 178 were male &#8211; we need more females to keep the guys happy! I&#8217;ll contact my ad guy and get him to come up with some female-oriented ads. The problem is, it looks like girls under 25 spend on average $15 less than guys aged over 25. I&#8217;ll get my stats guy to find the ideal ratio and age for maximum profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope the above monologue illustrates my point: something like the Nightkey system could <em>easily</em> turn you into a statistic. I&#8217;m not sure how much stat-crunching Nightkey can do out-of-the-box, but  even a little will give businesses a huge advantage in terms of clientele tracking. Is this a good thing, or a bad thing? I&#8217;ll let you decide.</p>
<h3>Fancy meeting you here</h3>
<p>Here&#8217;s a simple mash-up one could do: linking your Nightkey details to your Facebook account. And here&#8217;s a way around the privacy laws: &#8220;Add our application to your facebook profile and we&#8217;ll give you a free beer and VIP entry!&#8221;. Very tempting. The devil is of course in the <acronym title="End User License Agreement">EULA</acronym>. Almost instantly, you have complete demographic information about your punters. Then it&#8217;s just up to advertising. You can play god with your own club (and get that power trip that the bouncers get when they turn someone away). Not that club owner&#8217;s don&#8217;t try and do all this already.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m trying to get at is that this type of  technology means that you could <em>build communties through statistical analysis.</em> <a title="Hyperconnectivity: a wiki definition" href="httphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperconnectivity">Hyperconnectivity</a> could soon mould our physical social interactions. We could be entering the next social paradigm shift, the next renaissance. A Brave New World. If we could steer this in the right direction: minority groups could prosper, culture would be fortified, people could be connected to their perfect matches. In the wrong hands: I won&#8217;t go there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.thetelegraphic.com/2008/a-hyperconnected-night-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

